Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as a screen in to the process that is scientific

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as a screen in to the process that is scientific

Current Commentary

  • Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday celebration, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Regret on Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Lee Rudolph on Drug researchers trip up, raising paper that is meth compose one on LSD

We’re on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine

Nine years back this Saturday that is coming August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a weblog about retractions?”

Just What happens to be clear when you look at the intervening nine years is exactly what a rich vein retractions are as stories of what goes on whenever one thing goes incorrect in technology. So when we now have done each year at the moment, we’ll review just just what occurred within the last few year.

Share this:

Drug researchers trip up, raising paper that is meth compose one on LSD

Evidently meth is really a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.

Scientists in Asia have forfeit a 2019 paper how LSD could harm vision because they’d lifted a lot of the paper from articles which had showed up the entire year before in a unique log — about methamphetamine.

The retracted article, “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. In accordance with the article:

Share this:

Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper

A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a couple of scientists in Saudi Arabia after finding a complaint that is“serious about the integrity for the information. Nevertheless the very first writer of the paper forced right back, saying the move had been unjustified.

The content, “Successful usage of blended corticosteroids and rituximab in someone with refractory polyarteritis that is cutaneous,” had been authored by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad health City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic operation. It described (with instead grisly photos) the actual situation of a man that is 25-year-old serious leg ulcers that remedied after the described combination treatment.

But during the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:

Share this:

Kyoto University suspends author that is first of Kumamoto quake paper

Initial writer of a now-retracted paper in technology in regards to the aftereffects of the deadly 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan happens to be suspended from his college position for starters year.

Intending Lin, regarding the Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, had been sanctioned because of the organization for misconduct stemming from his abuse of information and plagiarism when you look at the 2016 paper:

Share this:

Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has resulted in a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, high-risk and deceptive eye that is; genetics’ high retraction price

Before we provide this week’s sunday Reads, a concern: would you enjoy our weekly roundup? If therefore, we could actually make use of your assistance. Can you think about a donation that is tax-deductible help Weekend Reads, and our everyday work? Many Many Thanks beforehand.

Share this:

Forensics Friday: can you flag this paper if it were under review?

Ever wished to hone your talent as a medical sleuth? Now’s your opportunity.

Because of the United states Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB), that is focused on educating writers on recommendations in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a string, Forensics Friday.

Have a look at the image below, and then simply simply simply take our poll. From then on, click the website website link below to discover the right solution.

Share this:

Cock and bull tale contributes to retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper

The ancients had thing for hybrids custom writings (think pets, not vehicles): half goat-half people, horses with peoples torsos, winged horses and lions, you will get the image. But a chicken-cow mix wasn’t on that list … until now.

A team of scientists in Brazil has lost a paper in a journal that is veterinary attempting to reuse information from a chicken research within their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.

The content, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes dysfunction that is mitochondrial cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never impact virus replication,” starred in February into the journal Veterinary Microbiology.

Share this:

‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information make fluorosis paper a banner

A current article that provided a stark caution in regards to the dangers to kiddies of fluoride into the nation’s water happens to be tagged with a manifestation of concern following the book of an innovative new paper which undermines the reliability regarding the initial information.

This article, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health studies: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a journal that is dental. The very first writer on the paper is Christopher Neurath, for the American Environmental wellness research Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.

The content, that used data through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) when it comes to years 2011 and 2012, reported increases that are“large extent and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to into the mid-1980s.

In line with the scientists:

Share this:

Gravitational areas, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: How did this “pure, utter nonsense” go into in a peer-reviewed log?

Often, a paper arrives that is therefore revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore as opposed to you will need to do justice to a current paper in Parasitology Research, we’ll reproduce several paragraphs right right right here:

Share this:

Leech paper nets phrase of concern

A write-up claiming to uproot the tree that is evolutionary of has gotten a manifestation of concern after having an audience notified the journal about possible difficulties with the information.

The content, “Phylogenomic analysis of the putative missing link sparks reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press name, on June 19 of the 12 months. In line with the writers — a worldwide group that includes scientists during the nationwide Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *