Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions being a screen to the clinical procedure

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions being a screen to the clinical procedure

Present Remarks

  • Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday celebration, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Regret on Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, lifting paper that is meth write one on LSD

We’re on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine

Nine years ago this coming Saturday, on August 3, 2010 essay help, we published a post, “Why write a weblog about retractions?”

Exactly just just What is now clear into the intervening nine years is exactly what a vein that is rich are as tales of what the results are whenever something goes incorrect in technology. So that as we’ve done each year at the moment, we’ll review just just what took place within the last one year.

Share this:

Drug researchers trip up, raising meth paper to compose one on LSD

Evidently meth is just a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.

Scientists in Asia have actually lost a 2019 paper on what LSD may damage vision because they’d lifted most of the paper from a write-up which had showed up the entire year before in a journal that is different about methamphetamine.

The retracted article, “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal damage in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. In accordance with the article:

Share this:

Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper

A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a couple of scientists in Saudi Arabia after getting a “serious complaint” about the integrity regarding the information. Nevertheless the very first writer of the paper pressed straight right back, saying the move had been unjustified.

The content, “Successful usage of blended corticosteroids and rituximab in an individual with refractory cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa,” ended up being authored by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad healthcare City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic operation. It described (with instead grisly photos) the way it is of the man that is 25-year-old serious leg ulcers that fixed after the described combination treatment.

But in the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:

Share this:

Kyoto University suspends very first writer of retracted Kumamoto quake paper

Initial writer of a paper that is now-retracted technology in regards to the outcomes of the lethal 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan happens to be suspended from their college place for starters 12 months.

Intending Lin, associated with the Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, was sanctioned because of the institution for misconduct stemming from their abuse of information and plagiarism within the 2016 paper:

Share this:

Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has resulted in a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, dangerous and deceptive” attention research; genetics’ high retraction price

Before we provide this week’s sunday Reads, a concern: Do you really enjoy our weekly roundup? If therefore, we’re able to actually use your help. Can you look at a donation that is tax-deductible help sunday Reads, and our everyday work? Many Thanks ahead of time.

Share this:

Forensics Friday: could you flag this paper if it had been under review?

Ever desired to hone your abilities being a sleuth that is scientific? Now’s your opportunity.

As a result of the United states Society for Biochemistry and Biology that is molecular(, which will be focused on educating authors on guidelines in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a string, Forensics Friday.

Have a look at the image below, and then simply take our poll. From then on, click the website link below to discover the right answer.

Share this:

Cock and bull tale contributes to retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper

The ancients possessed a plain thing for hybrids (think pets, perhaps perhaps not vehicles): half goat-half people, horses with individual torsos, winged horses and lions, you obtain the image. But a mix that is chicken-cown’t on that list … until now.

A small grouping of scientists in Brazil has lost a paper in a journal that is veterinary wanting to reuse information from a chicken research inside their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.

This article, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes dysfunction that is mitochondrial cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never influence virus replication,” starred in February when you look at the journal Veterinary Microbiology.

Share this:

‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information make fluorosis paper a flag

A article that is recent provided a stark caution about the dangers to young ones of fluoride within the nation’s water is tagged with a manifestation of concern following the publication of a fresh paper which undermines the dependability for the initial information.

The content, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health studies: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a journal that is dental. The author that is first the paper is Christopher Neurath, regarding the United states Environmental wellness research Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.

This article, that used information through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) when it comes to years 2011 and 2012, reported increases that are“large severity and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to towards the mid-1980s.

Based on the scientists:

Share this:

Gravitational areas, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: just just just How did this “pure, utter nonsense” go into in a journal that is peer-reviewed?

Often, a paper arrives this is certainly therefore revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore as opposed to attempt to do justice to a paper that is recent Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a couple of paragraphs right right right here:

Share this:

Leech paper nets phrase of concern

A write-up claiming to uproot the tree that is evolutionary of has gotten a manifestation of concern after having a audience notified the log about possible issues with the info.

The content, “Phylogenomic analysis of the putative missing link sparks reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press title, on June 19 of the 12 months. Based on the writers — a worldwide group that includes scientists in the nationwide Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *